Tuesday, December 21, 2004

Good news for men who want sex changes...

from cnn.com today:

Male fish bear eggs in Potomac
Sewage or factory effluent may be cause of 'intersex' abnormality


SHARPSBURG, Maryland (AP) -- Male fish that are growing eggs have been found in the Potomac River near Sharpsburg, a sign that a little-understood type of pollution is spreading downstream from West Virginia, a federal scientist says.

The so-called intersex abnormality may be caused by pollutants from sewage plants, feedlots and factories that can interfere with animals' hormone systems, The Washington Post reported Sunday.

Nine male smallmouth bass taken from the Potomac near Sharpsburg, about 60 miles upstream from Washington, were found to have developed eggs inside their sex organs, said Vicki S. Blazer, a scientist overseeing the research for the U.S. Geological Survey.

Authorities say the problems are likely related to a class of pollutants called endocrine disruptors, which short-circuit animals' natural systems of hormone chemical messages.

Officials are awaiting the results of water-quality testing that might point to a specific chemical behind the fish problems, Blazer said.

"It certainly indicates something's going on," Blazer said of the new findings in Maryland. "But what, we don't know."

The Potomac River is the main source of drinking water for the Washington metropolitan area and many upstream communities. It provides about 75 percent of the water supply to the 3.6 million residents of Washington and its Maryland and Virginia suburbs.

Blazer, who works at a federal fish lab in Leetown, West Virginia., said she found the latest abnormalities last week while examining tissues from fish taken from the river near Sharpsburg.

The same symptoms had previously been found about 170 miles upstream, in the South Branch of the Potomac in Hardy County, West Virginia.

Blazer and other scientists discovered the problem there last year while investigating a rash of mass fish deaths.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service researchers are seeking money for a much larger study across the Potomac watershed.

Endocrine disruptors comprise a vast universe of pollutants capable of driving a hormone system haywire. Some are hormones themselves -- such as human estrogen from women taking birth-control pills or animal hormones washed downstream with manure -- that can pass through sewage plants untouched.

In Hardy County, officials were especially concerned about chicken waste from poultry farms.

Others endocrine disruptors are hormone "mimics" -- industrial chemicals or factory byproducts which confuse the body because they are chemically similar to natural hormones.

These pollutants are often found in very low concentrations, so until recently no equipment could detect them. But the first nationwide survey, in 1999 and 2000, found hormones in about 37 percent of streams tested.

Many scientists are concerned that people, as well as other animals, might be affected. "It's not good news that there's something that feminizes male fish in your water," said Gina Solomon, a senior scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

But the Environmental Protection Agency has not set standards for many of these pollutants. Because of this, many drinking-water plants make no special efforts to remove them.

Authorities in West Virginia are investigating whether there is a link to higher rates of certain cancers in people there.

A recent survey of cancer in Hardy County, where some residents get drinking water from the South Branch, found rates of cancer of the liver, gallbladder, ovaries and uterus that were higher than the state average. All four cancers can in some cases grow faster in the presence of estrogen or chemicals that mimic it, cancer experts said.

"It is at least theoretically possible that those two concepts are worth thinking about side-by-side," said Alan Ducatman, chairman of the Department of Community Medicine at West Virginia University.

I don't even know where to begin with this one. The cancer thing is not funny at all, but, hell, whoever thought we'd be able to blame the hemophrodite thing on the water! How hysterical would it be if every man's worst fear (as illustrated on that one episode of "The Cosby Show" where all the guys give birth to various objects) suddenly became a reality (and in West Virginia nonetheless...as if that state doesn't have enough familial-related stereotypes to deal with already). I wonder if those child-bearing male fish get picked on as much as their male-with-female-qualities human counterparts. If that's not a killer sequel for "Finding Nemo," I don't know what would be.

Thursday, December 16, 2004

I'm converting...

I have to say that, while working in an office environment can normally be very boring and mundane...it's the best place in the world to be at Christmas time. Everyday we get packages of food delivered from various clients and such. Bagels, chocolates, GIGANTIC baskets of Christmas-time desserts...etc, etc, etc. I am currently noshing on a pecan bar from Heaven. I can't even imagine how much fatter I would have been as a teenager if I had been Christian and ate this stuff every year.
Let's not forget to mention Christmas parties and lunches. Last week was a small gathering thrown for our department with alcohol and various hors dourves (Bari, did I spell that right?), yesterday was the Secret Santa lunch with tons of Italian food and Secret Santa gifts (I got a Jem and the Holograms t-shirt!!!!!) and tonight is a giant Christmas bash for all of Home Entertainment and then we Creatives are going karaokeing afterwards.

I would like to take this time to personally thank Jesus for being born during this time of year. Without you, none of this would be possible. We'd all be Jews or Muslims (and some Eastern religions...but the Western world knows jack about their holidays, so for the purposes of this blog, they don't count). We'd be fasting for 40 days and then clients would send baskets of dreidels, crappy chocolate gelt, latkes and jello-molds (which I guess is pretty equivalent to fruit cake, without the bread carbs).

MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!

Saturday, December 11, 2004

And THAT my friend, is cah-losure

Is it sad and pathetic that I am still so damaged from a relationship that ended a year and a half ago? Is it sad and pathetic that watching "Sex and the City" and hearing Aidan yell out to Carrie, "YOU BROKE MY HEART!" made me sob uncontrollably as I drove home, staring into my dashboard thinking about how incredibly broken I still am?

I am pretty convinced that the deadly combination of a complete and utter lack of closure and my inability to get over things has ruined me in the boyfriend department. Part of me really wants one, but another part is smarter and says that I need to concentrate on myself for a while. That smart part needs to do a better job at reminding me not to watch "Sex and the City." I don't really even think about Joe that much anymore and I really have moved on...for the most part. But, every so often, all these "what ifs" pop into my head, the most prominent being "What if I just saw him, out of the blue (which would never, ever happen)? What would I do?" I can never answer that one. It's something I always wish would happen...probably because I am so starving for closure.

I wish they sold closure on Amazon. I'd ask for it for Hannukah.

Wednesday, December 08, 2004

Save Christmas!!

Ok, so this "separation between church and state" thing is going a little too far now (well, not just now, I am sure the topic I am about to discuss has been an issue for some time now, but anyway). In Maplewood, NJ, the Columbia High School brass ensemble is not allowed to play any Christmas songs as part of their repetoire.
"Holiday celebrations where Christian music is being sung make people feel different," said Mark Brownstein, a Maplewood parent. "And because it is such a majority, it makes the minority feel uncomfortable."
Also, AOL.com has a poll question up that asks: "Should religion be included in public holiday celebrations?"

Now..if religion was taken out of these holiday celebrations...what holidays would we be celebrating? Without Christmas, Hannukah, Kwanzaa etc, this time of year would mean nothing except that the calendar's about to advance a year. And, in my opinion, the only reason we even celebrate winter and snow as enthusiastically as we do is because of Christmas. I had a conversation with a coworker the other day about her past experiences with Christmas carolling. I was talking about how I'd never really experienced it before (as in, a group of people showing up at my door and singing "Oh Holy Night") and she was telling me about the time she and her friends ran around town in 8th grade singing to people. Being that Cherry Hill was pretty much half Jewish, Christmas songs weren't really so abounding, unless you were listening to B101. She was mentioning songs, like "Frosty the Snowman" and such and I came to realize that, eventhough there is no mention of Christmas, Jesus, Santa or even reindeer in there at all, I've still always lumped it in there as a Christmas song.
So, anyway, taking religion out of holiday celebrations would effectively take the holidays out of the celebrations, and all we'd be left with is a parade celebrating the fact that everyone is walking around freezing their asses off.
As for taking Christmas out of the public spectrum...it's stupid. Sure, it's a religious holiday, but its an extremely prominant one, one that has become such a great tradition in American society. I mean, come on...unless you are at the mall...people are generally much nicer around Christmas...so more power to it!
As for the guy above who is saying hearing Christmas songs makes him feel different or whatever...when it comes down to it, Christmas music just kicks Hannukah music's ass. If we wrote better Hannukah music, I'm sure it'd be played all over the place. But, come on..."The Dreidel Song" is for 3 year olds and "Sivivon" is really quite mean sounding and not so cheerful (oh, and also, Christmas music is in English (well, except "Feliz Navidad"...damn, that's one catchy-ass tune!)).

I had more planned to say about this topic earlier, but I have to get off the computer now, so I guess we're all stuck with this. But, either way, the moral of the story is...long live Christmas (but praising God in the Pledge of Allegiance can go...)

Thursday, December 02, 2004

Federally-funded abstinence programs are awesome!

From www.democracynow.org:

Abstinence-Only Programs Spread Misinformation About AIDS & Abortion

A new Congressional report has found that many students participating in federally funded abstinence-only programs have been taught misleading and inaccurate information about abortion, homosexuality and AIDS. Students have been taught that abortion can lead to sterility and suicide, that half the gay male teenagers in the United States have tested positive for AIDS, and that touching a person's genitals can "result in pregnancy." This according to a report in the Washington Post. The Congressional report found that for the past three years, the Bush administration has been strongly promoting these abstinence programs even though they frequently relied on medically inaccurate or misleading information, often in direct contradiction to the findings of government scientists. The Congressional report examined the 13 most widely used abstinence-only curricula; only two of the program were deemed to be accurate. Democratic Congressman Henry Waxman of California said, "Something is seriously wrong when federal tax dollars are being used to mislead kids about basic health facts."


Touching a person's genitals can result in pregnancy?!?! Wow,I feel so ignorant for not realizing that my hands had holes in which sperm could pass through and reach my uterus via, I guess my bloodsteam? Or maybe, just maybe, my fingers actually have tubes that connect to my uterus, for the sole purpose of hand-job impregnation (which is fast becoming one of the leading ways 15-yr olds are getting impregnated these days).

Right on, Mr. Waxman. This is totally and completely fucked up. I am really starting to wonder if human beings are really moving horribly backwards through time. What's next? Are our kids going to start learning about how the world is flat and that the Earth is the center of the universe?

Tuesday, November 23, 2004

YEAH!!!

MY BROTHER GOT A JOB AT LAW FIRM!!!! HE'S A LAWYER!!!!!

He won't ever read this...but I am so proud of him!

Monday, November 15, 2004

To Teddy DePrince...

Today Cherry Hill mourns the loss of Teddy DePrince...who, while I did not know him that well personally (as in, I probably only met him once or twice), I've never been able to forget him. He and his younger brother, Cubby (who I knew in 2nd grade and will always remember him singing the "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles" theme song on the bus), both contracted HIV from blood transfusions ( I think they were both hemophiliacs). This was during the Ryan White years, so we all sorta knew what AIDS and HIV was and learned very easily, from real life examples, what the disease was all about. Cubby, who was, I think, the same age as me, died some years ago. Teddy lived on, was very active in high school and for some reason left a very lasting impression on me (and I am sure everyone else who came in contact with him). He always had a smile on his face and was extremely outgoing. He was the kind of kid who, when you saw him in the hallway, you were automatically happy for that moment...eventhough you didn't even really know him. He was a role-model for people who wanted to know how to love life, because you could just tell how much he appreciated what he had left of his.

Ben Abo had this away message up tonight...it is a message we've all heard a million times, but it can never be reitterated enough.

"I have learned from a great friend that life is but a limited time on earth and to enjoy life to it's fullest for ourselves and others. While that friend physically may be gone, his life & his lessons live on deep within our hearts. You will always be with us, Teddy "

Tuesday, November 09, 2004

I finally realized....

Last week, as I sat listening to the first press conference Bush gave after he was elected, something clicked in me regarding what my problem has been with this whole war situation for the past 2 years. As Bush was giving his usual schpiel about spreading freedom and what not, I began thinking about all the other free and democratic nations in this world, and how their democracy came to be, ours being a prime example. There are these things called civil wars and revolutions...many countries have had them. It's when the citizens of a country get together, decide they want some change and fight like mad for it. In France, during the French Revolution, the common folk rose up against the monarchy, and eventually those common folk had overthrown their government and started anew...the way that they wanted. Sure, it took about 10 years and a lot of people died, but these people really wanted to be free, so they kept at it. I don't know if anyone paid attention in elementary school history class, but our country did the same damn thing.
I know that Saddam Hussein was a bad, bad man, but what gives us the right to invade that country, topple its leader and impose our way of living on their people? Fear of an attack? Sorry, not good enough. Put yourself in an Iraqi's shoes. You live in Baghdad. You have a family and own a little shop down the street. You're not living in the lap of luxary, but you're happy and things are going fine. Suddenly, the most powerful army in the world starts bombing your city. Your home and business is destroyed. How are you feeling right now? You're probably pretty pissed. You want to fight back. You want to defend your country from these invaders. Now, according to us, you are an insurgent. You're not a simple man who is trying to defend his homeland, but you're an evil terrorist trying to stop the spread of freedom. This morning I was listening to an anecdote being told by an American citizen, who was around our age, about the time he recently spent in Iraq. What he saw was pretty terrible. He described meeting various Iraqi militants whose story was similar to the fake person I described above; regular men who were just trying to protect their families and their land against an invading army.
Don't get me wrong, I am all about human rights. I agree with the lot of us that think everyone in the world deserves to be free. However, changing the societal structure of an entire nation is something that should happen on that country's own terms, in their own time. If they decide they really want to fight for their freedom and call on us for help, then fine, send troops (remember how France and Germany (well, Prussia...) helped us win our freedom?). But, until then, leave societies to their own and work on improving freedom in our own country.

Wednesday, November 03, 2004

post-election mourning...

Well, it's all over. My anger and sadness has considerably subsided throughout today (I think I am out of my crying phase, although who knows what could happen as I think myself to sleep tonight), but I still remain baffled by the choice a little more than half this country made (and I can't see that confusion going away anytime soon).
I absolutely cannot believe that the most important issue on the minds of so many voters dealt with morality. This man (Bush) sent our troops to pre-emptively strike Iraq without telling us, the citizens paying for it, the plain truth about it. He then arrogantly claimed victory in that war, even though it was not really over and is still going on right now (and will continue to go on for much longer than we were ever led to believe). They voted for this guy because they don't think gay people should be allowed the RIGHT to get married and they don't believe a woman has the RIGHT to get an abortion.
I will never be able to stop thinking how completely absurd that is. Ok, so I'm not, in any way, saying that anyone who believes in religion is brainwashed, but if there are this many people in our country that are so firmly against something that their personal beliefs recognize as wrong, that they would put other citizens' freedoms in jeopardy, then there are certainly some circuits that have gone haywire in their minds. I have yet to hear or read one (or even half of one) a good reason why America, as a political entity, needs to ban gay marriage and abortion. Sure, you may not believe that gay marriage is right...but that doesn't mean your opinion is right for everyone else. Two gay men or women getting married does not and will never affect you, so don't worry about it! And, sure, you may believe that abortion is morally wrong, but it will never effect you if you don't want it to. The beauty about the abortion thing is that it is something that occurs within your own body. So, unless you are kidnapped and forced to have an abortion, you have a choice regarding what you want to do. If you believe abortion is wrong, than don't get one! What is wrong, however, is imposing this view upon another woman (who maybe was raped and impregnated, or is addicted to heroine and knows that she would not be able to provide proper care to this baby) as a law forbidding her from making her own decision about what to do about the fetus growing inside her own body.
I think this country is at a point where religion has become somewhat of a road block in progress. We are moving backwards in the areas of women's rights and gay rights. I am not saying, at all, that religion is bad and that politicians shouldn't be religious people; however, once it becomes a top-3 selling point for a candidate and his/her decisions negatively effect some citizens of this country, they've taken it just a little too far.

Tuesday, November 02, 2004

This says it all...

Should Bush win, as is projected....

From a comments page on BBC News.com
"What's funny, except for America, Kerry would certainly have won an election anywhere else in the world."
HA Qureshi, Islamabad, Pakistan


That's pretty damn scary that the only people in the world who support George Bush are half of America and a bunch of international government guys.

Friday, October 22, 2004

Run for the border...

File this one in the "who would have ever thunk it" category:

From CNN.com
"Americans run to Mexico for flu shot
Pharmacies in Mexican border towns say they are struggling to meet demand.
October 22, 2004: 4:41 PM EDT
REYNOSA, Mexico (Reuters) - Americans unable to find this year's scarce flu vaccine at home are crossing the Rio Grande to buy the shot in Mexican border towns, where pharmacies are struggling to meet demand."

One point for Mexico for having something important that the US doesn't (besides a lower drinking age).

Tuesday, October 19, 2004

Political ranting...per usual

There's a couple things I want to address in this post....

First off...last night on C-Span I watched some of a round-table discussion that featured a group of women in Wisconsin being asked questions concerning the election by some white research guy with white hair (yes, they all do seem to look like that). The group of women included a few white stay-at-home moms who were concerned about moral issues (several were (surprise surprise) CHRISTIANS!!! and i'm not just assuming that...they mentioned it themselves), an undecided 20-something yr old who voted for Bush in 2000 but isn't too thrilled with him anymore, a hispanic nursing student, a wise-sounding democratic 40-something yr-old (who just had that look of calm cyncism that is typical of those type of women), a black vocational counselor who is worried about jobs, a totally fed-up Generation-X'er with a spikey boy-cut and some other women who I can't seem to remember. It seemed like these women were picked by casting agents to attend this discussion. The things that were said by these women during this discussion were mostly typical. It was interesting, though, to find out that pretty much all of them were skeptical of Kerry regarding the tax issues...and I don't really blame them. By the end of the discussion, I was annoyed with the people I expected I would be annoyed with...those pesky Christian stay-at-home moms (note: I don't dislike all Christian stay-at-home moms, but these women didn't do much to sway any stereotypes). It saddens me a little to think that these women are actually raising children and teaching them right and wrong. This one woman, Rebecca, erked me the most...especially when she spoke about stem-cell research (which, for me, is a major issue). She talked about money shouldn't be put into it now since it isn't expected to make a difference for another hundred years...and that we should focus on curing diseases like breast cancer. First...stem-cell research can help cure cancer as they can be used to test medicines (www.nih.org). Second...breast cancer isn't going to be cured in a day. They have been doing research for years and years and years. Research takes time...and if we procrastinate on stem-cell research now, then we're just putting off possible cures for the future. Rebecca, how would you like to have Polio? Cause it's quite possible you could have suffered from it had scientists procrastinated in finding a cure for that!
An overall frustration I have been feeling during this election has do with terrorism. People are proud of Bush because America hasn't been attacked since 9/11, and based on that, they believe the War on Terrorism is going well and will probably be over soon. Kerry is criticized because he is realistic and seems to understand that terrorism is not just an American problem, but a global problem and that it's not something that can be wiped out with a swift action alone. It seems to me that many Americans are just unaware of how important a role America plays in the world and that our actions not only effect us, but also everyone else in the world...which brings me to my next topic:
One of Great Britain's leading liberal newspapers, The Guardian, has begun a pro-Kerry letter-writing campaign aimed at swing (I assume) voters in Ohio. Now, not surprisingly, there's a firestorm of criticism surrounding this. Some people are outraged that the Brits are butting in our election affairs ("'Hey England, Scotland and Wales, mind your own business. We don't need weenie-spined Limeys meddling in our presidential election,' was one of the e-mail reactions to the campaign." ~ cnn.com). On one hand, I agree that this letter-writing thing is a little weird, but at the same time, I can see why they would want to even do it in the first place. Americans are viewed, by some in the international community, as closed-minded and completely devoid of interest in the effect this whole war thing has had on an international scale (for example, I would really love to know what the rate of global terrorist attacks post-Iraq War has been compared to before, I feel like it's probably substatially higher, but that just might be a self-fullfilling prophecy on my part). What's wrong with wanting to give Americans a personal view of what things look like from an international point of view? Also, why is it OK for us to go to, say, Afghanistan, and tell them they should be democratic, yet British people aren't allowed to write some letters to us about how they think our citizens should vote? What bad could come out of it anyway? These voters get a letter and it inspires them to do some more research? Oh no! Research is a terrible thing...right Rebecca?

Friday, October 15, 2004

I don't even know...

Man, I HATE! toenail fungus ads!!! The ones on TV make me squimish as it is, but even in cartoon form as an internet ad gives me the willies (yes...the willies). Seeing a cartoon picture of a ragged, infected toenail is the last thing I want to see when I check my hotmail account. Then, when they animationally life up the toenail...oh man! Even though there isn't anything under there...anyone who has ever had a severely broken toenail can feel the pain of actually being able to lift up your toenail .

I should sue hotmail for showing that ad...claiming it put me through a ton of emotional stress as I recalled the time I smashed my toe by the pool when I was 13. How many millions do you think I could squander out of that one? Talk about litigation abuse....

Thursday, October 07, 2004

The government and office equipment...

Today, I realized that there are some striking similarities between the government and office equipment...that they are twins, separated at birth...sent to Earth to destroy all humans.

- They are both ridiculously huge and expensive.
- Nobody really has a masterful hold on how they work and it is very rare that they work the way you want it to.
- When they break, they are fixed...only to break again 5 minutes later.
- They cause loads and loads of uneeded, intense frustration.

That's all I can conjure up at this moment...if I think of anymore, I'll post them.
In the meantime, feel free to gimme some suggestions and find your own comparisons! Whoo hoo!

Wednesday, October 06, 2004

Shower shoes...

And I always thought that flip-flops were sandals you wore in order to avoid getting foot fungus from dorm showers. But now, they are politicians. Not just John Kerry, but now, the Bush Administration is one big, giant flip-flop. In last night's Battle of the VP candidates, Dick Cheney got a little taste of what's it like to be called a flip-flopper. Edwards - "Now, flip-flops: They should know something about flip-flops. They've seen a lot of it during their administration." He went on to mention some examples: The 9/11 Commission...first they were against, then for it. The Department of Homeland Security...first they were for it, then against it. Promises made from the beginning of Bush's presidency were not kept (putting money aside for Social Security, funding for the No Child Left Behind Act). Edwards squashed the credibility of the Republican flip-flop argument (if you can even say there was much credibility in it in the first place).

The whole idea of flip-flopping, coming from the mouths of either candidate, is retarded. Changing your mind is natural. People do it all the time. I just changed my mind 5 seconds ago when I decided to use the word "retarded" instead of "ridiculous." You should probably stop reading this now...you don't want to be influenced by the opinions of a flip-flopper. Anyway, even L. Paul Bremer (who CNN describes as "whom President Bush appointed as head of the Iraq occupation" (whatever that means) went and semi-flip-flopped his comment about there not being enough troops on the ground in Iraq. First he said "We never had enough troops on the ground," then he said, later on, when the Republican Ministry of Magic threatened to send him to Azkaban if he didn't promise to make things right, turned around and said "One way to have stopped the looting would have been to have more troops on the ground. That's a retrospective wisdom of mine, looking backward. I think there are enough troops there now for the job we are doing....We certainly had enough (troops) going into Iraq, because we won the war in a very short three weeks. The point that I have been making, and that has gotten a little bit distorted in the press recently, is that, as I look back now, I believe it would have been better to stop the looting that was found right after the war."

So, what have we learned here today? It's OK to flip-flop if you are a member of the Bush Administration, but it's not OK to flip-flop if you are John Kerry. Wait...or is it the other way around? I can't make up my mind.

Monday, October 04, 2004

My secret crushes and patriotism...

I admit it. For as long as I can remember, I have had crushes on the Big 3 Nightly News men. Ok, not so much Dan Rather, but definately Tom Brokaw and Peter Jennings. I grew up watching the ABC World News and was drawn to Jennings' sexy Canadian accent and never-graying hair (thank you, Just For Men). Anyway...last night on C-SPAN (the best channel in the universe, by the way), they ran a panel discussion from this weekend's New Yorker Festival (eat your heart out OzzFest!) featuring Rather, Brokaw and Jennings (*sigh*) commenting on the media today. It was midnight and I found myself interrupting my falling asleepness to jot down notes. That's how interesting it was. Hell, I even clapped along with the audience after several comments. I wish I could relay all of the good points they made, but I just can't remember them all. So, I'll cut to the chase and discuss some of the points I wrote down.

First off, I was rather impressed with Dan Rather admitting that he wished he had asked tougher questions around the time of the beginnings of the Iraq war. He also admitted that he wasn't tough enough to handle being labeled unpatriotic had he decided to go against the majority national opinion of the time and pressed the more controversial issues. Of course, he has been doing a lot of "admitting to being wrong" lately, so maybe this was just something he needed to get off his chest while he was at it. But, either way...it kinda goes to show how strong the pressure of the word "patriotic" is and how it can alter the actions of even our most distinguished journalists. There was an interesting opinion piece on CNN.com last week about the word "patriotism"
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/28/patriotism/index.html Basically, "patriotism" is now an ideology rather than a physical showing of one's love for his/her country. There's no denying it, unless you happend to have been deaf for the past few years, that the word "patriot" has been thrown around and misused like a cheap whore (yeah! over-used analogy!!). To be called "unpatriotic" today seems to have a similar stigma attached to it as being called a "Communist" must have had during the years of the Red Scare (hmmm, Vietnam/"Communist": Iraq/"unpatriotic"...again, hmmm). The words "patriot" and all it's family members, are now buzzwords, like Weapons of Mass Destruction or Terrorism. Words that have lost their true meanings due to overuse by politicians who cater to the dumbing down of America by restricting their vocabulary to 3-4 keywords. Two years ago, when our current Iraq situation was becoming more than just an idea being thrown around Congress, to disagree with the war was "unpatriotic." In fact, ever since 9/11, to disagree with the government and the power of America was a bad thing. I can remember, on Sept 12, how much I was hated when I disagreed with students in my classes who said we should bomb the hell out of Afghanistan. Was I being unpatriotic by trying to view the situation from a more global point of view than some other people? Was I being unpatriotic in March 2002, when I sat with skeptism (sp?) watching a black and neon green nightvisioned Baghdad explode on ABC, wondering why it was happening? Am I being unpatriotic now by still not totally agreeing with the way we went about this war and wanting the President to be more clear on what's going on? If you choose to look at things in black and white, as it seems many Americans do, than yes, I am very unpatriotic.

On another note, going back to the Big 3 panel, Tom Browkaw also made a point about how there should be more debates during presidential elections. I agree. I think there should have been debates for at least the past 2 months. 3 presidential debates are not enough (especially if they are going to all be non-debates as last week's was). There should also be more attention paid to them by network TV stations. The presidential election is the most important thing going on in our country right now. More important than who is going to be "fired" or refuse to eat cow testicles on "Fear Factor." There should be more news specials that air in prime time everywhere in America focused solely on the issues and educating people about where each candidate stands, factually, on each issue. Sure, it's not as exciting as watching the Bachelor make out with all the contestants in one show, but, Jesus, it's pretty damn important. It's not fair that the only people who are able to get extended political coverage are those who have enough money to afford cable.

I could go on about this for another 9505096 paragraphs, but I'll refrain seeing as probably only one of you reading this has actually gotten this far without falling asleep or getting lost in my ramble.

Wednesday, September 29, 2004

Office etiquette

Do you work in a big office where not everybody knows each other? Do you hate the obligatory quiet politeness that everyone shows all the time? Like you aren't allowed to have a personality if you work in an office.

The thing I hate the most is the closed-mouth half smiles I always find myself giving people (who I don't know, yet work with) as I walk by them. The worst is when you start the trek down a lengthy corridor and see someone way down at the other end coming your way. You know eventually you are going to have to make eye contact with that person, flash a fake half smile and maybe utter a "hi" under your breath. So, the entire walk up until that point is spent diverting your attention either at the posters on the wall (which you have looked at so many times by now that there can't possibly be anything new to see) or awkwardly straight ahead, waiting for the exact right time to look at the oncoming traffic. If you stare too long at a person, you're weird. I mean, this is an office, not a park...no people watching allowed. It's even worse when you walk by two people having a conversation. There is a strict "no looking allowed" rule there. Don't want to seem like you're interrupting anything just to say a soft "hey."

There have been many times I have told myself that I would be outgoing and give people nice, hearty "HI!s" but, I've never actually been able to do it. Maybe one day.

Monday, September 27, 2004

Can't we all just get along?

Reading about all the barbaric madness happening in Sudan makes me really sad. I cannot understand how people like the Janjaweed can have such total disrespect non-caring attitudes towards human life. As I read the articles on this subject, and read the details of some of the violence, I get the same feeling of sickening shivers and nausea that I felt as I walked around the Terezin concentration camp in the Czech Republic when I was 16.
But, I guess having had a very privileged life so far, there is no reason why I would ever have to try and understand this kind of violence. I can’t put myself in these peoples’ shoes.
It's weird to think that, to us (as in the constantly educated middle class members of the Western World), pogroms and murderous rampages are things that just should not happen anymore. We think, "Haven't these people learned from the past...and seen how incredibly terrible genocide is?" But, if you really think about it, I doubt these people know anything about world history really, except maybe stories about their own cultures passed down from previous generations and taught through religion. It’s also weird to think that there is not enough worldwide governmental support to go in there and stop all of this, and even to impose sanctions against Sudan. America is busy in Iraq and Afghanistan, Arab countries won’t get involved because the Janjaweed are pretty much Arab nomads, and other top countries, like Pakistan and China, are too interested in Sudan’s oil industry to put a strain their governments’ relationships (source: Time Magazine through aol.com: The Tragedy of Sudan: Simon Robinson Visit Darfur and Witnesses What is Happening While the World Dithers).

Sometimes I wish I lived under a rock somewhere and never found out about any of this.

Wednesday, September 22, 2004

The Bible Goes Ultra-Hollywood

Before we get to the meat of this post....two things I observed on my way home from work today:
1) I hate it when, in bumper to bumper traffic on a road with lights, people stop far away from the car in front of them. Don't they realize the adverse effects this may have for someone behind them (for example, somebody stuck in the middle of an intersection as the light turns red only needs a couple feet until he's out of traffic's way...if only the person in front of me would move up those couple of feet.......)
2) I saw this chick riding a chopper today. She looked like Stretch Armstrong on that thing. It was odd.

Ok, so here goes the real post.

Why I didn't blog about this 74939 years ago, I will never know, so excuse me for my tardiness.

Ever since I moved to LA, I've seen billboards for a new musical opening at the Kodak Theater. The annual Passover/Easter TV staple,The Ten Commandments, has been turned into a musical. Apparently it already had a run in Europe and the kind fashion folks at BCBGMaxAzria decided it would be a great idea to bring it over to the States. So...awesome. America loves biblical musicals. Especially when they star actors like Donny Osmond or Val Kilmer.

What? Val Kilmer!?

Yup. The hot, yet constantly stern-looking actor who has portrayed such classic characters as The Iceman, Batman, Jim Morrison and the murdered porn guy from Wonderland, can now add Moses, the singing leader of the wandering Hebrews, as part of his incredibly random resume. In the billboard picture, Kilmer has his typical mean look on his face. Like suddenly Moses is this tough guy ready to spray bullets into any evil Egyptians that get in his way. "Let my people go, you motherfuckers!!!!!!" And while he passes through the Red Sea, he turns around and says to the drowning Pharoah, in a deep macho tone, "We will never...be slaves again." And then he proceeds to run through a huge group of Hebrews, charging his staff in the air and yelling "Freedom!!!!" The Hebrews are totally pumped that they are going to spend the next 40 years wandering around in a fuckin' desert singing catchy Broadway tunes the whole time. "Go go go Moses you know what they say!"

Something in me just can't imagine Val Kilmer singing...in a musical. "Go down Moses, way down to Egypt land (or something). Tell old Pharoah, Let My People Go."

I don't know what's sillier about this...Val Kilmer as Moses or the fact that this show even exists at all. There needs to be some kind of limit put on what can be made into a musical. What's next? "Schindler's List: The Musical?"

Oy.

Tuesday, September 14, 2004

Thanks

I'm telling you...I have no idea where I would be without my friends. I've been pretty down for a little while, and without anyone to talk to about it all, I'd probably be a drug addict or something. I'm totally grateful for the people that I can fully open up to...that will listen to what's going on, support me and assure me I'll be ok. One of my most favorite feelings in the world is knowing that someone truly cares for me. There have been a lot of people in my past that I've held on to as friends because they are good people and I love them.

So, thanks to the lot of you for loving me back...it really means a lot.

Thursday, September 09, 2004

My gripe with Ken Jennings

According to CNN.com (which accordings to the AP), that UberJeopardyGeek, Ken Jennings (the holiest Mormon of them all, for God has sent him on a mission to win craploads of money on Jeopardy for the Chuch O' Latter Day Saints), has finally lost! Now, this show has not been aired yet (according to the article, it was shot on Tuesday), but let me just rejoice in advance (under the assumption that this is even true). This guy had a 75-game winning streak, mounting up winnings of over 2.5 million bucks. Many would claim that to be "amazing" or "admirable." I hated him. Eventhough I am a superfan of the show, I can at least admit that Jeopardy isn't the most exciting game in the world in the first place, but without competition (because Jennings just went on there and kicked everyone's ass pretty much every time), it's even worse. Seriously, Jeopardy, you got rid of your 5-day max winning streak thing, and put a highschool quizbowl question writer on your show? I felt bad for all the people whose life-long dream has been to get on Jeopardy and at least compete, but then they are up against Ken Jennings and they don't have a chance to answer any of the questions! Ken Jennings forced Jeopardy into deeper depths of boringness. Even Alex Trebek hates him...you can tell. Good riddance K.J. Welcome back Jeopardy competition (I hope).

Wednesday, September 01, 2004

protesters vs. soldiers?

I can't say I was a huge fan of Democratic Georgian Zell Miller's speech at the RNC tonight. Like many democrats, I watched the speech with critical ears. One thing that stuck out and annoyed me was when he criticized protesters and compared them to soldiers.

Has he forgotten how this country was started in the first place? Has he forgotten about the Boston Tea Party? Has he forgotten about Thomas Paine? Has forgotten about the beginning of free press in America? Before anyone became a soldier in the Revolutionary War, they were PROTESTERS! They were groups of protesters that had had enough and decided to take physical action to obtain freedom.

Today's protesters are criticized for not having the balls to actually go into the military and fight. But, would you join the military to fight and possibly die for something you don't agree with? I wouldn't. America's original pre-Revolutionary war protesters became soldiers because they were fighting a war they believed in. For a cause they believed in. They chose to fight for the country they wanted.

Today, the protesters out there are against the war. Who of them would, in their right mind, join the military right now? They aren't out there protesting against the troops. They aren't out there protesting against America as a country. They are out there protesting the government.


Monday, August 30, 2004

ch-ch-ch-ch-changes

I've finally come to the definate realization that I need to put the past behind me for a little while, stop letting it get me down and making me moody and move the fuck on. I need to take the next few years to explore the totally rad parts of myself and stop worrying about what people are gonna think. I've been WAY too concerned with that my whole life, and it's lame.

So, this past weekend was neato. Andy had been out here all week seeing me, Rachel, Aaron and California. He wanted to see San Francisco and Berekely, so we drove up Friday afternoon, stayed at the W Hotel in Newark...middle of nothing Silicon Valley. But, there was a special on the room (which was actually a suite) and the room was totally hot. It kinda reminded me of my parents' house. Saturday we drove to PCH 1 via windey California mountain roads (the best roads in the world) and stopped at a random place along the coast and hiked down to the beach. After getting back to the top, all covered in outsideness and sweat, we made our way to San Francisco. We went over the Golden Gate (ba-dooby-doo-bop-bah-da) and my breaks freaked out and caused a gross smell from being pratically vertical on a hill in Sausalito, so we headed on back to San Fran. After some Quiznos, we checked out SFMOMA. I don't know who would win in a fight between NYC MOMA and SF MOMA, I like them both.

After MOMA, we met up with Diana. "Who's this Diana character?" you are all not asking yourselves....Friendster has made e-stalking much easier (simply Googling people is so a thing of the past), and while wandering through Camp Harlam's friends, I came upon Diana. Camp Harlam doesn't drum up many good memories for me (which is probably part of the unintentional torturing I have put myself through during the past few years), but I knew that, at one point, Diana and I were friends, so i dropped a line. Thankfully, she is just as much of an e-stalker as I am and didn't think it freakish that I suddenly felt like getting in touch after 8494 years (and you all know how obssessed I am with keeping in touch with people). Long story short, hanging out Saturday night was awesome and I'm thankful for e-stalking. We both got to see how much cooler we've gotten since camp...and how well we've grown out of our awkward teenage years. Good times that I hope will continue.

Sunday, I visited one of my old managers from Tower San Jose at her new, gigantic "WOW" stomping grounds in San Mateo. She informed me of some sad news....Laura Branigan (of "Gloria" and "Self Control" fame) died of a brain aneurysm. Poor 80's icon. I got a new pair of headphones for the turntables. Not the best in the world, but much better than the little earpieces I have. I bought 3 records the other day (Al Green's Greatest Hits, Madonna - Who's That Girl Soundtrack and some Disco Hits compilation) and I look forward to lying on the floor in my room just listening to them.

After checking out of W heaven, Andy and I headed up to Berkeley to check the campus out and take a tour. We had the tooliest tour guide ever. His name was Nick and he was a Math major. Need I say more? While walking around campus, I got this nostalgic feeling and started thinking that I wanted to go back to school. Nasty.

On the way back to LA, it was decided that my car is officially hurting. The passenger door is out-of-order until I can get it fixed. The constant shaking at 70 mph is all-the-sudden annoying me (except when I was sleeping...the full-body massage definately helped). And some plastic barrier thing broke in front of my front passenger-side tire (it's now duct-taped to something under there as to avoid making noise). The Mirage needs to go to a Spa.

The Republican National Convention is this week....we'll see how long I can watch it for before throwing up all over my apartment.

Thursday, August 26, 2004

wasted mexican food and turntables....

Last night was Margarita Wednesday, so Aaron, Andy, Rachel and I went to Mexicali in Studio City. Rachel and I spotted a very interesting situation happening while we were there. There were two girls (one was wearing a trucker hat) sitting at a table on the patio...they had recently gotten there. They were chatting and smoking cigarettes. They hadn't touched their chips and salsa. Then, their food got there, and they just pushed it to the side and kept smoking cigarettes and chatting. They were there the entire time we were there (throughout our 80584 hour wait and then all of dinner) and never once touched their food. They just chatting and smoking cigarettes.

Welcome to LA, Jessica.

I will never understand how anyone can sit there with a quesadilla in front of them and not eat it. That's a crime as far as I'm concerned.

Another thing....

I FINALLY GOT TURNTABLES!!!!!! I got a suggestion today that my DJ name should be DJ Tanner. I can do a remix of the "Full House" theme, along with other 80's TV themes. So, if you are at a club and you hear a techno mix of the "Perfect Strangers" theme, come say hello to me. haha.

Monday, August 23, 2004

the 80's truly have struck back

Look around you. Does it seem odd that the decade everyone has always claimed to be so bad and cheesy is suddenly back, but cleaned up and modernized a little? Thank you, VH1, for bringing back our love for the 80's. It's fucking everywhere now. Felix Da Housecat's new album is all 80's electronica, FeFe Dobson looks like a black and Canadian version of Punky Brewster (or a cast-member of "Kids Incorporated"), today's popular rock bands combine the lovely dance beat of disco hi-hats and the cookie-cutter craftiness of their song composition (i.e. the la-di-da happiness of The Strokes or the stunted Oi-wanna-be-ness of Franz Ferdinand). The Yeah Yeah Yeahs remind us why Siouxsie and the Banshees had such a following and the Cure and Morrissey have new CDs!

The chicks that habitate Sunset Strip hang-outs sport neon off-the-shoulder tops with ruffled skirts, but have nixed the acid-washed anything. Super-hold hairspray is an important accessory again.
Their male counterparts have been flipping up their polo-shirt collars and now spend just as much time on their hair, yet don't seem to have any exciting styles to show for it.
Walk into a Footlocker, and all the old Jordans are back....as well as other old school Nikes, Reeboks, Adidas and Kangols (where are my LA Gear and British Knights in all this!!!)
I went to a club last week and the Robot is back.
Oh, and don't even get me started on Von Dutch.

I find all this kinda cool...especially since i love the 80's so much. Yet, i'm annoyed that buying a pair of OLD STYLE nikes costs $65. Your company came up with the idea for this shoe 20 years ago....you haven't really done anything new to it....what's with the price!

I've lost my way with this post....but, either way....I welcome the 80's back with open arms. i just hope that the next trend doesn't bring back the early 90's....more New Jack Swing is just unecessary.


Friday, August 20, 2004

How 'bout some ideas for once?!

Election time sucks. Sucks bad. I am getting pretty tired of reading news stories about Kerry's military service, medals, post-war comments and Bush's supposed lack of military service and abandonment blah blah-frickin' blah! WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!

This just goes to show how out-of-whack the presidency is. People are more concerned with what might have happend in a river in Vietnam 30 years ago than about what might happen in OUR COUNTRY....THIS YEAR!!!!! RIGHT NOW!!!!! Stop nit-picking people.

The Democrats had a grand goal of running a positive campaign...which was a nice idea, but it's impossible in this stupid country. Especially when everyone is attacking each other all the time about things that have NOTHING to do with being president. Let's talk ideas for once, man! The presidency should not be about who is better-looking, more like everyman, or who might have inhaled a little marijuana at some point in his life. This is a blanket statement, but it seems like Americans are more concerned about a President's image than his ideas and ability to be a good President. We tried making a supposed-everyman President, and look what happend!

These campaigns should be about who is more concerned with making this country a better place to live, NOW and in the future. I think it's a shame, really, that the country is in such a state that, in order to win swing-votes, John Kerry kinda has to play-up his military past and spend less time talking about the issues. Are there really people that care that much about his military past that they would risk our country's future by electing Bush again?


Wednesday, August 18, 2004

Bowm bowm...Oooooh Yeaaah

2:30pm
I am listening "Oh Yeah" by Yello right now (you may remember it from such movies as "Ferris Bueller's Day Off" and such commercials as those older ones for Twix). I've never really listened to it before, but now that I've got headphones on, I am really hearing it.

Dude...it's scary. The only part I really ever remember from it is the "bowm bowm...ooooh yeeeaah" part. Little did I know that in between all that, "the voice" is also saying "beeeeaaauuutiful" "even more beautiful *hmph*" and "oooooh yeeaaah" in a very horny tone of voice. It's creepy. It sounds like Jaba the Hut getting a lap dance.

Not a fan.

4:25pm
On another note....I am now listening to The Go-Go's "Our Lips are Sealed." I would like to take this opportunity to actually thank the Duff sisters (Hilary and Hallie) for remaking the song. Forever, I have never been able to understand a word Belinda Carlisle was saying (before I even knew the name of the song (back in the day), I would always sing "All of Cecil" whatever that was supposed to mean)....but thanks to the Duffs, I can finally sing along with real words! God bless you, Lizzie McGuire and your sister!

Tuesday, August 17, 2004

LOGIC!

Just one thing really quick before I begin today's real Ramblings....

When making a microwave meal, does anybody actually let whatever it is stand in the microwave for 1 minute after cooking? I pretty much never do that...and nothing has ever been wrong with my food. I feel like that direction is as pointless as "lather, rinse, repeat as needed."

Now, back to you Jessica...

I cannot understand how anyone can go around and complain about how stupid liberals are (warning: post rated R: contains violent dictionary definitions). Does this sound like the description of a stupid person?

liberal adj.:
(1) Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.

(2) Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.

Someone who is not a bigot?!? How moronic!
Open to ideas for progress?!? Are you serious? Worst idea EVER!
Tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others?!? Oh come on! Amoebas are smarter than that!

Right.

From my point of view, most liberal ideas are the opposite of stupid (*"Sesame Street" moment* Elmo: "And what, children, is the opposite of stupid?" Group of politically correct, racially mixed kids: "SMART!!! Yeah!!!!" Elmo: "That's right!! Yeah!!! Now, tickle me!!!" *change the channel*). In fact, I would venture to say that a lot of the solutions we liberals want for this country are not just smart, but also pretty logical (Logic: the science of the formal principles of reasoning....in Jessica words: the science of it-just-makes-sense). So, I've set up a new liberal campaign for this year's presidential election. As much as I like John Kerry more than Bush, I am not a down-and-out terrorism-afraid American...so his whole "Hope is on the way" crap doesn't do anything for me. I want some change in the basic, duh kind of things that are going wrong around here. So, our new campaign slogan is simple...kind of like Jeb Bush's last gubernatorial campaign slogan in Florida...JEB! (yup, that was really his bumper sticker slogan, and he won...hmmm)...except our slogan is a real word with meaning.

LOGIC!

Here's how it will work:

We need to make health care more affordable. All people who work should be able to take their kids to the doctor without worrying if they will have enough oney to buy food for the next week.
LOGIC!

We need to roll-back that "tax-cuts for the wealthy" thing and actually give tax-cuts to people who need them.
LOGIC!

We need to stop funding nuclear weapons programs and put that money into inner-city schools so those kids can have the same education opportunities as those in richer communities.
LOGIC!

People actually want to put an amendment in the constitution that restricts freedom!! What? There is no good reason, whatsoever, to make gay marriage illegal. It doesn't affect ANYONE except those people who want to get married...so stay out of it and let them be in love!
LOGIC!

We need to take ourselves down from the sky-high pedestal we've put ourselves on and fix our relations with other countries. I don't see how alienating our alies is going to help make us any safer.
LOGIC!

We need to stop firing people in America and sending their jobs overseas. Do I really have to explain myself on this one...it just doesn't make any sense.
LOGIC!

We need to enforce corporations who pollute like mad to clean the hell up.
LOGIC!

Finally, for today...stem-cell research. We've put billions and billions of dollars into medical research, trying to cure diseases like diabetes and debilitating spinal chord injuries. Now we've found a way to fix things.
(say it with me)....
LOGIC!!

Wednesday, August 11, 2004

Guilty pleasure my ass...

I have a bone to pick with MSNBC.com. They have an article in their entertainment section about musical guilty pleasures (which must mean that there is NOTHING going on in music news in the past few days, because writing a "guilty pleasures" article is a guilty pleasure in and of itself: totally stupid and useless, but readers get a kick out of it because it sparks giggles when they see the name "Debbie Gibson" and then spend all day humming "Out of the Blue").

My problem with their specific article is that the first "guilty pleasure" mentioned is one of the best albums ever made..."Thriller" by Michael Jackson. That is absolutely NOT a guilty pleasure. Guilty pleasures are artists, songs and albums that are lame and/or just suck based on musical talent (other G.P.'s listed in this article include John Denver, The Spice Girls and Air Supply...all of which fit into the G.P. category perfectly). Author Denise Hazlick's reason for condemning "Thriller" to G.P. status is based solely on the fact that Jackson's public personna and character is creepy and scandelous. She admits the music is incredible, which automatically disqualifies it from even contending to be a G.P. Ms. Hazlick needs to take a few classes on the art of identifying guilty pleasures.

If she were to just say that Michael Jackson himself was the G.P., she could get away with it (thanks to the crappy songs that make "Dangerous" only half good, and especially thanks to "You Are Not Alone" *cringe*), but to involve "Thriller" is just plain mean.

I apologize to you, "Thriller," on behalf of Denise Hazlick.


Tuesday, August 10, 2004

It's like rain on your wedding day...

I was just scrounging around on CNN looking for something to spark the blogging bug in my mind, thinking I was going to make fun of politics again ( I mean, what else IS there to talk about?). Then I see "Police: Wedding guests eat victim."

"Hmmm," I think to myself. *click*

Apparently, a few guys in the Philippines have been watching too many episodes of "The Sopranos" while simultaneously showing "Silence of the Lambs" on another TV set. At his daughter's wedding, Eladio Baule, got super-pissed at his cousin, Benjie Ganay, for accidently tripping and touching the bride's ass. So, instead of just yelling obscentities at him or throwing a few punches, Baule and a few other macho family members found the act so unforgiveable that they took the accidental-ass-grabber to a secluded place and stabbed the crap out of him. Now, to add insult to mortal injury, Baule and family then proceeded to roast their beloved cousin's remains using coconut leaves and kerosene ( They must have gotten that recipe from "Iron Chef"). After forcing another cousin (by using the age old knife-to-throat method) to eat some, they brought the rest of Ganay's gourmet body parts back to the wedding reception and served him up to the drunk guests who were still partying it up ("It's fun to stay at the YMCA....ooh, what's this meat? Mmmm, it's good....Young man, there's no need to feel down....").

So, Alanis...rain on your wedding day ain't so bad anymore now, is it?

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/asiapcf/08/10/philippines.cannibal.ap/index.html

Monday, August 09, 2004

Hello Kitty's controversial activities...in French!

So far today has been a pretty funny day ( I spent a good 10 minutes laughing so hard and keeping it quiet that I started to get tears in my eyes and cramps in my stomach).

Lots of the DVDs I put into this database come in various different formats...such as French DVDs. So, there are French titles listed and I send them to Bari so she can translate them....just for kicks (it's not like it's a challenge or anything, it's just something to break up the monotiny of the day). This morning was Hello Kitty's time to shine...as she and her 79,839 DVDs took up a good chunk of my time.

According to these DVDs, Hello Kitty is a very versatile feline. She does all sorts of crap, like Saving the Day, Playing Pretend, Telling Fairytales, Going to the Movies...hell, she even Becomes a Princess. Little do people know...she also does a lot of other, way more controversial things that Sanrio doesn't want you to know about. Somehow, being the super-sleuth that I am, I was able to expose Hello Kitty for the horrible animal that she is. And here for your trivia pleasure are some of those DVDs Sanrio has been covering up all these years....in French! Try to translate them on your own and then check out the answers at the bottom of this post! Ooooh, Fun!

1) Hello Kitty construit les armes nucléaires.
2) Hello Kitty soulève l'alerte de terreur.
3) Hello Kitty trouve les armes de destruction massive.
4) Hello Kitty surdosage sur E à un éloge avec les jumelles de Bush.
5) Hello Kitty course pour la siege de senat du Missouri et perd a un homme mort mais elle devienne ministre de la justice des Etats-Unis.






1) Hello Kitty builds nuclear weapons.
2) Hello Kitty raises the terror alert.
3) Hello Kitty finds weapons of mass destruction.
4) Hello Kitty overdoses on E at a rave with the Bush Twins.
5) Hello Kitty runs for Missouri Senate, loses to a dead guy and becomes US Attorney General.


Friday, August 06, 2004

I guess this is all a little long overdue....

One would think that me having a blog would've been something that should've happened a LONG time ago, being that I pretend to know a lot about computers and like to spout out meaningless comments on anything and everything going on in life. But, nonetheless, I never had one until my partner-in-archaeological crime, Bari the Wise Law Student of Fordham University and Co-Queen of Sarcasm (I feel a "Princess Diaries" spoof coming on....), urged me to start one. I mean, I post stuff on MySpace every so often...but that stuff is mostly about important topics, like politics and such. What I need is a place to spill out the random such and such comments that pop into my head and need to be shared (for example, I hate how Ashlee Simpson wears a tee-shirt that says "Punk" on it...you are not a friggin' punk!) Many times I'm all excited to share them with someone, but if no one is online to receive them, they eventually disappear, never to see the light of day.
So, here it is...finally. Hopefully you will all enjoy my random "musings" (I put that in quotes because I never use that word...it's so pretentious. Oy, so is the word "pretentious"...anyway).

Now, what was the topic we were speaking of that sparked all this blogging madness?

My current employment situation has me sitting in front of 2 monitors at the MGM Home Entertainment offices copy and pasting movie information from a Word document into an online database. I get very ADD with it, so being AIM all day long keeps me sane.
I think that it's pretty funny that "sensuality" is a rating reason for movies. Like, "this movie is rated R because it contains Violence, Language and Sensuality." What the hell does that mean?

Well, according to Dictionary.com, the noun sensuality means: "The quality or state of being sensual or lascivious." And since using the root word and an even more ambiguous word in the definition tells us nothing, we'll have to go a step further define those also.

sensual adj - (1) Relating to or affecting any of the senses or a sense organ; sensory.
or the definition probably used by the ratings people:
sensual adj - (2a) Of, relating to, given to, or providing gratification of the physical and especially the sexual appetites.
lascivious adj - Given to or expressing lust; lecherous

Ok, so Sensuality seems to mean a Sexual Situation with feelings, desire and a positive outcome that feels good; Sensuality is a Sexual Situation in which the people involved actually like each other.

Dear Ratings Reasons People:
Enough with the complications! In the end, Sensuality is just another, more loving name for a Sexual Situation. What happend to the old days when ratings reasons were simple, and all we needed to know was that there's sex, violence and cursing? What's next...are you going to break down the sexual situations like you've done with the "violence" category ("Showgirls" is rated NC-17 as it contains an erotic scene of Elizabeth Berkeley and Kyle McLachlan having raucous sex in a pool, various breast-exposing situations, nude women pushing each other down flights of stairs...etc. etc.)?
Sincerely,
Jessica

Ok, back to work. (Rated PG-13: Contains violent data entry situations, thoughts of swear words and sexual situations)